Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Conference Series Events with over 1000+ Conferences, 1000+ Symposiums
and 1000+ Workshops on Medical, Pharma, Engineering, Science, Technology and Business.

Explore and learn more about Conference Series : World's leading Event Organizer

Back

John A. Posada

John A. Posada

Delft University of Technology, Netherlands

Title: Into the design of sustainable biorefineries: A techno-economic, environmental and social assessment of biojet fuel production chains in Brazil

Biography

Biography: John A. Posada

Abstract

This study presents the interim results of a screening of multiple combinations of feedstocks, logistics, conversion technologies, processing conditions and regional aspects for a biojet fuel production chain in Brazil. Thus, the number of possible scenarios is narrowed down from more than 200 options to 3 relevant cases.

The analysis is divided into two stages: i) screening of conversion technologies and different scenarios according to feedstock availability, techno-economic and environmental indicators; and ii) the most promising scenarios from Part I are designed and simulated in order to introduce more details in the techno-economic evaluation, environmental analysis and social assessment.

For techno-economic evaluation, the overall biojet fuel yield and the minimum selling price are considered as selection criteria; while for the environmental analysis, the used comparative criteria are greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and primary energy use. In the case of the social assessment, the effects of the production chains on six main aspects are considered: employment, working conditions, labor rights, equity, education level, and GDP.

The interim results are separately discussed for each dimension of sustainability (i.e. techno-economic, environmental and social) by comparing the pros and cons of the most relevant production chains. Although the information/data generated is quite extensive, detailed, and consistent among  the production chains, the discussion on the ‘best’ option is deliberately left open for decision makers who can based their choices on the relative importance assigned to individual assessment criterion.